Exemplary Figure
|
Figure 2. Available slip rate and paleo-earthquake age data from the central Garlock fault. (A) Incremental fault slip rate plotted vs. time. Yellow horizontal band encompasses range of preferred average latest Pleistocene-Holocene rates measured by Clark & Lajoie (1974); McGill & Sieh (1993); McGill et al. (2009); and Ganev et al. (2012). Solid red line shows known rates. Note correspondence of rapid latest Holocene rate measured during our 2013 SCEC studies with cluster of four earthquakes observed by Dawson et al. (2003) at their El Paso Peaks site 25 km west of our slip rate study site. Dawson et al. (2003) documented an absence of earthquakes between 2ka and ~5ka, yielding a 0 mm/yr rate for this interval. For the two earthquakes they documented at ~5ka and ~7ka we assume a range of possible displacements for each event of 2 m (the smallest geomorphic displacement measured along the central Garlock fault by McGill & Sieh, 1991) to 6 m (ave. slip in four earthquakes totalling 24 m as measured at our Christmas Canyon West study site), yielding 4-12 m of slip within this ~2kyr period. Combined with the 24 m of fault slip measured by us over past 2kyr, this yields a total of 28 to 36 m of slip on the Garlock fault since 7ka. Green, gray, and pink boxes show possible incremental rates prior to 7ka that are consistent with the 70 m of total displacement measured by McGill et al. (2009) and Ganev et al. (2012) that has accrued since latest Pleistocene-early Holocene time. Three possibilities are shown, given the uncertainty in the exact time at which the 70 m of displacement began to accumulate: (1) a 19-24 mm/yr incremental rate from 7.5 ka to 9.3ka (preferred age of incision for 70 m offset at McGill et al., 2009, study site); or (2) a 9-11 mm/yr incremental rate from 7.5ka to 11.5ka (following Ganev et al.’s suggestion that incision began during return to wetter conditions at end of Younger Dryas climatic regime); or (3) 5-7 mm/yr incremental rate from 7.5 ka to 13.3 ka (age of incised surface at Ganev et al., 2012, 70 m offset). Note that these three speculative “rates” assume constant steady slip during these time periods, a behavior we consider unlikely, especially for the 4-6 kyr-long periods represented by the latter two possibilities. This method of presentation thus artificially reduces the average rates shown during these intervals. (B) Same data plotted as cumulative displacement through time. Triangular region between 7.5ka and 13.3ka denotes range of possible cumulative displacements. Note the pink and yellow horizontal bands. These show the key positions of our 37.5 m (pink) and 55 m (yellow) offset targets. Dating of these two offsets with our robust post-IR-IRSL225 luminescence dating technique will allow us to complete our characterization of the incremental slip rate of the Garlock fault for the entire Holocene. The addition of our proposed study of the rate based on the 175 m offset should tell us if the longer-term rate on the fault is also comparable to the average latest Pleistocene-Holocene rate. (C) Available paleoseismologic data for the central and western Garlock fault. The well-constrained site of Dawson et al. (2003) lies closest to our study sites. |